UEIon request
CAGEon request
NYC MBECertified
NAICS541512 · 541511 · 541519 · 518210 · 611420
Live CustomersNYC · Since 2024
· The toolkit ·

Five things it ships with · today, not on the roadmap.

Each capability is in production with paying customers. No "coming soon" labels. No private betas behind a sales call.

Stack of federal proposal documents
PLATE IA working solicitation, marked up · the unit of analysis
01§ Discovery

SAM.gov match scoring

Every active solicitation, scored 0–100 against your firm.

We pull the SAM.gov feed nightly and run each opportunity against your firm profile · NAICS, set-asides, clearance level, geographic constraints, and the past performance library you've built in the product. The result is a single number from 0 to 100 with the factors broken out, so a "92" doesn't feel mysterious.

  • 01NAICS + set-aside fit
  • 02Clearance + key personnel match
  • 03Past performance overlap
  • 04Size standard verification
  • 05Saved-search alerts (in-app + email)
Fig. 02 · How a SAM.gov solicitation becomes a score01 PULLSAM.gov + agency forecasts~22k active opps02 PARSESection L/M, NAICS, set-asideOCR + AI extraction03 MATCHAgainst your firm profileNAICS · clearance · PP04 SCORE0-100 bid/no-bid fitPublished eval factorsOUTPUT · SAMPLEW56KGY-26-R-0142STRONG MATCH92GS00Q-26-R-0088WORTH PURSUING81N00178-26-R-7001STRETCH7647QFCA-26-R-0014NO-BID41
02§ Drafting

Section L–compliant drafting

A first compliant draft in minutes, not hours.

GovBid AI parses each Section L instruction, finds the three of your past projects that actually fit, and writes a narrative that cites them. Tone-matched to your firm's historical prose. Citations preserved with the original PP entry IDs so reviewers can verify provenance.

  • 01Each L-paragraph addressed
  • 02Past performance cited inline
  • 03Voice matched to your prior wins
  • 04Compliance matrix auto-generated
  • 05Track-changes export to Word
Fig. 01 · Section L → Past Performance matchSOLICITATION · SECTION LL.3.1Demonstrate prior experience on cloud migrL.3.2Three (3) projects within last five (5) yeL.4.1Key personnel with active Secret clearanceL.5.2Quality assurance plan referencing CMMI L3PAST PERFORMANCE LIBRARY · SAMPLEPP-014DHS S&T cloud lift-and-shift · $3.4M · 2023PP-022NAVAIR data warehouse modernization · $5.1MPP-007Treasury OCIO container migration · $2.8MPP-031CMMI Level 3 appraisal · Apr 2024Draft narrative for L.3.1 · synthesized from PP-014, PP-022, PP-007~8 MIN · COMPLIANT · CITATIONS PRESERVED
03§ Forms

SF-330 autofill

Parts I & II completed from your past performance library.

The form most A/E firms dread, finished in the time it takes to make coffee. Block E project descriptions are written to the agency's preferred narrative voice · we keep a corpus of accepted SF-330s by agency and tune accordingly.

  • 01Part I · contract data
  • 02Part II · firm qualifications
  • 03Block E narratives, agency-tuned
  • 04Key personnel résumés merged
  • 05PDF export, fully fillable
Fig. 03 · Where the 8 minutes go8:00MEDIAN, FROM SOLICITATION TO DRAFTParse §L1:00Past performance1:24Draft narrative1:54Tone + voice1:18Citations + SF-3301:08Compliance scrub1:16↑ THE PART THAT USED TO TAKE YOU 3 DAYS
04§ Strategy

Win-probability scoring

Read Section M before sinking a week into Section L.

We read the published evaluation factors and tell you, plainly, where this proposal will and will not score. Often the right answer is to walk away · that's a feature, not a bug. The hours you save on a "no" are the same hours you spend winning the next "yes".

  • 01Section M evaluation factor parsing
  • 02Strength + weakness mapping
  • 03Competitor inference (where public)
  • 04Clear "go / no-go" recommendation
  • 05Red flag callouts
Fig. 02 · How a SAM.gov solicitation becomes a score01 PULLSAM.gov + agency forecasts~22k active opps02 PARSESection L/M, NAICS, set-asideOCR + AI extraction03 MATCHAgainst your firm profileNAICS · clearance · PP04 SCORE0-100 bid/no-bid fitPublished eval factorsOUTPUT · SAMPLEW56KGY-26-R-0142STRONG MATCH92GS00Q-26-R-0088WORTH PURSUING81N00178-26-R-7001STRETCH7647QFCA-26-R-0014NO-BID41
05§ Pre-submit

Red-team mode

A contrarian read on your draft, before the submission button.

Page-limit scrub, compliance matrix verification, and an adversarial re-read against the published evaluation criteria. The same kind of review a $400/hr proposal consultant gives you the night before submission · at the speed of a coffee break.

  • 01Compliance matrix · automated
  • 02Page + word-count audit
  • 03Section M factor coverage
  • 04Adversarial pre-read
  • 05Final formatting checklist
Fig. 01 · Section L → Past Performance matchSOLICITATION · SECTION LL.3.1Demonstrate prior experience on cloud migrL.3.2Three (3) projects within last five (5) yeL.4.1Key personnel with active Secret clearanceL.5.2Quality assurance plan referencing CMMI L3PAST PERFORMANCE LIBRARY · SAMPLEPP-014DHS S&T cloud lift-and-shift · $3.4M · 2023PP-022NAVAIR data warehouse modernization · $5.1MPP-007Treasury OCIO container migration · $2.8MPP-031CMMI Level 3 appraisal · Apr 2024Draft narrative for L.3.1 · synthesized from PP-014, PP-022, PP-007~8 MIN · COMPLIANT · CITATIONS PRESERVED
§ HonestyWhat is not built yet · and what we are not building
Slack notificationsQ3 2026

In-app + email alerts ship today. Slack is a roadmap item.

Calendar syncQ3 2026

Deadlines surface in-product. Native Google/Outlook sync coming.

SSO / SAML / SCIMQ4 2026

Email + TOTP MFA today. Enterprise SSO is on the roadmap.

CRM sync (HubSpot, Salesforce)Under evaluation

CSV export today. Bidirectional sync depends on customer demand.

Real-time co-editingNot planned

Single-author drafts with version history is the model. We do not plan Google-Docs-style multiplayer.

Mobile appNot planned

Responsive web only. The work is desk work.

Bring a live solicitation. Leave with a draft.

Start a 14-day trial